I just finished reading this article: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=scientists-discover-childrens-cells-living-in-mothers-brain
"Scientists Discover Children's Cells Living In Mothers Brains" by Robert Martone.
The article describes how cells are transmitted between mother and child in utero; some of mother's cells migrate to fetus, some of fetus' cells migrate to mother.
This is not an uncommon occurrence, and happens in the animal world as well as in humans.
The connection Mr. Martone makes is that these cells can help or hinder the growth of certain diseases: cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and multiple sclerosis are all mentioned. Mr. Martone draws the conclusion that women with cancer and Alzheimer's disease somehow allowed less microchimeric cells into their bodies than the average woman without cancer and Alzheimer's. On the other side of the coin, it is thought that the presence of the microchimeric cells somehow contributed to the growth of Multiple Sclerosis.
I offer a contrary alternative to these conclusions. Don't get me wrong, I am not offering myself as an expert in the field, just a differing opinion.
It is possible that when the microchimeric cells are faced with cancer and Alzheimer's cells, that they get used up, and are disposed as waste. In my (laymans) way of thinking, I picture it like using a paper towel. It is very useful, it has done it's job, but now it is nothing more than waste. Thus, when the microchimeric cell has finished it's usefulness, it is thrown away, and that would be why the researchers failed to find as many as they may have expected. In my hypothesis, the cancer and Alzheimer's in these cases were just more of a mess than the body had microchimeric cells (paper towels) to clean up with.
As for the case of the Multiple Sclerosis: the article stated that those with MS had more microchimeric cells than the average person without MS. Perhaps the MS cells were not the kind the microchimeric cells could clean up. Of course, it is possible that Mr. Martone was correct in the conclusion that microchimeric cells might somehow assist the MS cells in their growth. Or, it might be that the microchimeric cells inhibited some other type of cell and the unintended byproduct of that inhibition was the growth of MS cells.
For now, we do not know, but this was a fascinating article anyway
Laura
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Sunday, January 27, 2013
The Cultural Defense
As part of my required reading for one of my courses, I read
“When in Rome” by Nina Schuyler (1997) which describes an alarming trend in
criminal defense concerning immigrants from other countries. Defense attorneys are using the “Cultural
Defense” to argue that since the person in question was raised in a different
culture, that the individual should not have to be held accountable for
breaking the law.
One of the examples given is that a mother left an infant in
the care of a nine-year-old; the infant died.
“Charged with involuntary manslaughter, the mother argued that the
childcare norms of the [culture from which she was raised] are different from
those of the [current culture in which she lives]…” (Moulder, 2000: 15).
Another example was concerning the marriage of under-age
girls (13 and 14) to adult men (28 and 34, respectively) on the basis of
religious practices. The defense in this
case was that “The U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of religion…They should
be allowed to practice their religion in this country,” (Moulder, 2000:
14). Let me see—that defense doesn’t
work for the Fundamental Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in regards
to their religious practice of polygamy, why should it work for this family?
Since this is such a problem in certain areas, maybe we
should look at the process of immigration a little differently. Maybe we should provide each adult immigrant
with a pamphlet on our laws here as a country, possibly written in their native
language, just to be sure they can read it.
Additionally (to make sure to not exclude the illiterate immigrants), a
person with legal knowledge should be available to answer the questions such
immigrants have, especially in the early years in their new homes.
All of this would help to prevent the lag in what was
acceptable in the previous culture and what is acceptable in their new
culture, before these people commit a crime. After all, if they decided to
come here, they should accept their new culture. I’m not saying they need to completely
assimilate: they should be allowed to continue their religion, food
preparation, language, etc., but such activities should not be allowed if they
conflict with the law.
It is not ok to “mercy kill” your sister/ daughter because
you think she is immoral for kissing her boyfriend.
It is not ok to force women to completely cover their bodies
when outside the home.
It is not ok to keep your daughters home from school because
you feel an education will lead them away from whatever religious upbringing
you want them to attain.
It is not ok to kill your son because you suspect him of
participating in homosexual activities.
We are a culture that holds dear the ideal of equality of
all persons. We need to focus on attaining that ideal.
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Starting a new semester
This week has heralded the start of a new semester for me, complete with four courses, comprising the required 12 credit hours to make me a full-time student!
Yay!
This has been quite the busy week, and it is only the end of Wednesday.
With most courses up until this time, I expect the first week to be filled with the preliminary organization tasks (read and print the syllabus, organize my folders on my thumb drive, tabulate my textbooks, and buy a new pack of highlighters, etc). However, it seems I have chosen graduate courses for this semester: they require an actual assignment to be completed the first week (not just the expected "introduction" on the discussion board or email to the instructor).
By the way, in case you hadn't picked up on this little detail from my writings above, I am taking all of my courses online. I highly recommend taking most of your college/ university courses online, with a few exceptions. For me, those exceptions include mathematics courses (calculus, etc.) and science courses (biology, chemistry, etc.). Oh, and that pesky communications course that requires you to speak in front of an audience of so many members. I tried to do that one online, but I just didn't have access to an audience of at least 50 people at my beck and call, just waiting to hear me speak (and be video-taped for proof) on four separate occasions...Gee, I thought everyone had that kind of access! (lol)
Anyway, for those waiting on the edge of your seats waiting to know: I am taking "Introduction to Women's and Gender Studies" with professor McGonigal, "Social Problems" with professor Johnson, "Advanced Sociological Research" with professor Brinker, and "Grant Proposal Development" with professor Campbell.
I dropped the nutrition course I was going to take (yes, that would have meant 5 courses this semester) because I found that it wasn't going to be significantly different than the previous health and nutrition course I already passed. I was hoping to find something more specific, but I suppose googling everything will have to do.
Back to the grind-stone...I have several chapters to read, powerpoints to watch/listen to, and a video presentation to watch...all before next week.
I love school!
;)
Yay!
This has been quite the busy week, and it is only the end of Wednesday.
With most courses up until this time, I expect the first week to be filled with the preliminary organization tasks (read and print the syllabus, organize my folders on my thumb drive, tabulate my textbooks, and buy a new pack of highlighters, etc). However, it seems I have chosen graduate courses for this semester: they require an actual assignment to be completed the first week (not just the expected "introduction" on the discussion board or email to the instructor).
By the way, in case you hadn't picked up on this little detail from my writings above, I am taking all of my courses online. I highly recommend taking most of your college/ university courses online, with a few exceptions. For me, those exceptions include mathematics courses (calculus, etc.) and science courses (biology, chemistry, etc.). Oh, and that pesky communications course that requires you to speak in front of an audience of so many members. I tried to do that one online, but I just didn't have access to an audience of at least 50 people at my beck and call, just waiting to hear me speak (and be video-taped for proof) on four separate occasions...Gee, I thought everyone had that kind of access! (lol)
Anyway, for those waiting on the edge of your seats waiting to know: I am taking "Introduction to Women's and Gender Studies" with professor McGonigal, "Social Problems" with professor Johnson, "Advanced Sociological Research" with professor Brinker, and "Grant Proposal Development" with professor Campbell.
I dropped the nutrition course I was going to take (yes, that would have meant 5 courses this semester) because I found that it wasn't going to be significantly different than the previous health and nutrition course I already passed. I was hoping to find something more specific, but I suppose googling everything will have to do.
Back to the grind-stone...I have several chapters to read, powerpoints to watch/listen to, and a video presentation to watch...all before next week.
I love school!
;)
Thursday, January 17, 2013
How I View "15 Things"
I ran
across this article: http://thoughtcatalog.com/2013/15-things-you-can-do-to-be-your-best-self-today/
by Nico Lang, to which I decided to add my own little interpretation.
1) “Try to have conversations with people you casually meet
in everyday life.”
Actually, I do this every time I go out: I use people’s
names when I speak to them, I smile, and I bid them “good day.”
2) “Remind people in your life how much they love you and
mean to you.”
I make sure to give my husband and children lots of love
every day. We give each other hugs, tell
each other “I love you,” and frequently do little things to show love. We have funny little words we use to tell
each other we love each other, such as “bunkies,” and “gobs.”
3) “Text people back right away.”
Unless I’m driving, I text people back right away. I feel that if that person has taken the time
to attempt to contact me that I should respect them enough to respond. It really doesn’t take that much effort, but
that person might be waiting on my response.
4) “Ask yourself how you can be a better friend to people or
better support them.”
At some point, everyone feels they are doing their best, but
there is another point where everyone feels they cannot do any worse. Hopefully, we can find a happy medium
somewhere. If we love our friends, and
if our friends love us, we will all appreciate each other and forgive our
mistakes. If one of your friends is
doing something you would like stopped (or if you would like that friend to do
something) you really need to discuss it with that person. Only communication will help in this
situation. You never know—that thing
that has been driving you nuts might actually turn out to make sense, and you’ll
learn to love it.
5) “Get up early.”
Well, I get up at 2 am most mornings.
6) “Smile more and laugh more.”
I smile when I feel happy, I laugh when there is something
funny. I frown when I am sad, and I cry
when I am very sad. I run the gamut of
feelings. I allow myself to feel, I
allow myself the luxury of understanding my own feelings. I think it is very sad that many people do
not even know how they feel. Many people
don’t allow themselves to feel anything “negative.” I think this is a mistake. You cannot learn to fix whatever is “negative”
if you don’t even know when you have those feelings.
7) “Do something you didn’t think you could or always wanted
to do.”
I am studying Sociology at University, and will graduate by
the end of Spring 2014 :D
8) “Learn how to apologize.”
I have to say, this one was difficult for me. Learning to accept when I have made a
mistake, learning to forgive myself, and learning to ask for forgiveness has
been a process. Sometimes I apologize
without accepting my own apology.
Sigh. We all have room for
improvement.
9) “Let go of our anger, envy, and hatred.”
Wow—this one can be difficult as well. There are times when I can be very angry, and
not want to let it go for a while.
Sometimes I get angry that I feel anger.
Now *that* can be a vicious circle!
10) “Don’t use your iPod all the time.”
From this, I figure Ms. Lang includes all music playing
devices: these can include MP3’s, portable CD players, or even (for those old
schoolers) walkmen. Also, from her text
it is clear that Ms. Lang is advising all to listen to the natural sounds
surrounding them.
To this sentiment, I cannot add anything more.
11) “Complain less and make fewer excuses for yourself.”
Well, this assumes that the reader frequently complains, and
makes excuses—that may be true, but should not be assumed.
That being said, those who do complain just might need to
learn to appreciate more. Also, those
people might need to learn to accept responsibility.
From me, “appreciate the beauty around you, accept the
responsibility that is yours, release responsibility for what is not yours.”
12) “Do something nice for someone else—the kind of favor
you might not see returned.”
If you only do things for people because you will get a
favor in return, you are missing out on many opportunities in life. When you do something for the sheer purpose
that it needs to be done (even without gaining recognition for it), you get a
satisfaction you could never gain by only doing things with the purpose of a
reward.
13) “Give someone a completely unsolicited compliment.”
I have always felt that the compliment doesn’t mean as much
if I had to ask for it. If the compliment
wasn’t going to be given freely, I probably didn’t deserve it.
14) “Do something completely unexpected or spontaneous.”
Tattoos are cool ;)
15) “Try something new—just for the experience.”
Does blogging count?
I’m sure you can tell, I’ve only been doing this a few weeks.
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Gruesome
This morning, my husband and I were discussing a roadside
memorial we had seen. He thought it
might be connected to a story in the local news lately, and talked about how
the news casters had described the murder as “gruesome”. And then he asked the question which started
my mental gears in motion: “Is any death not gruesome?” I answered, “Yes, dying in your sleep is
quite peaceful.” He came back with, “But
isn’t that still gruesome?” My response:
“Define gruesome.”
This
brings me to this moment now. I took the
time to look up the definition of “gruesome,” a word I hear frequently in the
news and elsewhere. According to my
favorite reference (and one of my top five most visited websites)
dictionary.com, gruesome is defined as: 1) causing great horror; horribly
repugnant, grisly; 2) full of or causing problems.
1)
Depending on the circumstances and the family and friends affected, you can
easily define death as “causing great horror,” “horribly repugnant,” and even
“grisly.” [As an aside (because I am
just that way), I looked up “grisly”: 1) causing a shudder or feeling of
horror; 2) formidable; grim.]
Personally, I can see death as a welcome respite, a long sought-after
friend, for certain cases, but I understand how others can see death as
unwelcome, horrible, and feared, regardless of the circumstances surrounding
the end of life. The subject of death
hits different people in distinct ways, but that is a subject for another post.
2)
Every death is potentially “full of or causing problems.” No matter how much the individual or family
has prepared for the eventuality of death, there always seems to be that one
more thing that didn’t get done. But
even then, there is the subject of grief that must be dealt with. No matter how much you have expected it, even
waited for it, at the end, when it finally happens, the grief is real. It must be dealt with. It brings its own set of problems.
My
conclusion: yes, I can concede that every death is gruesome in one way or
another. This discussion just
illustrates the ideal that you really do learn something every day—especially
if you seek out that learning and allow yourself to absorb the new information.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Einstein's Riddle
I picked up this riddle off a Facebook post. As a self-described math geek (who used to go through logic puzzle books for fun), I was intrigued:
Einstein (reportedly)
wrote this riddle early during the 19th century. He said 98% of the world could not solve
it. It’s not hard, you just need to pay
attention and be patient.
There are 5 houses in 5 different colors. In each house lives a person with a different
nationality. The 5 owners drink a
certain type of beverage, smoke a certain brand of cigar, and keep a certain
pet. No owners have the same pet, smoke
the same brand of cigar, or drink the same beverage.
The question is: Who owns the fish?
*The Brit lives in the red house.
*The Swede keeps dogs as pets
*The Dane drinks tea
*The green house is on the left of the white house
*The green homeowner drinks coffee
*The person who smokes Pall Mall rears birds
*The owner of the yellow house smokes Dunhill
* The man living in the center house drinks milk
*The Norwegian lives in the first house
*The man who smokes Blend lives next to the one who keeps
cats
*The man who keeps the horse lives next to the man who
smokes Dunhill
*The owner who smokes Bluemaster drinks beer
*The German smokes prince
*The Norwegian lives next to the blue house
*The man who smokes Blend has a neighbor who drinks water
As the instructions for this riddle are incomplete, I have
to make a few assumptions. The fact I
have to make these assumptions make this riddle flawed; but since certain
questions are not answered, one must start with some assumptions. Because of these assumptions, there may be
more than one accurate answer to this riddle.
My assumptions:
I assume the five houses are on one street; on one side of
the street; that number 1 is on the left, that number 5 is on the right, and
that they are sequentially numbered; that my position is from the street, and
that all directions within the riddle are from my vantage point.
1) Yellow; Norwegian; Water; Dunhill; Cats
2) Blue; Dane; Tea; Blend; Horse
3) Red; Brit; Milk; Pall Mall; Bird
4) Green; German; Coffee; Prince; Fish
5) White; Swede; Beer; Bluemaster; Dog
Thus, the answer to the riddle: The German (who lives in the
green house, drinks coffee, and smokes Prince) owns the fish.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)